Why the Republicans treat health as a product?
Every argument I hear universal health care is that some people are lazy and not eventually pay for their own. So what? I mean, we spend billions of dollars in a war that is questionable, but I do not care spend our own people? What the hell? We are not talking about cars, TVs, computers, or some other shit, we're talking about health. And a government more small CLAIM. But how much larger has become the government (especially the White House) since Bush took office?
attention Universal Health is not an acceptable solution, and will extend the existing problems of a system of payment by the government of the third …. can not pay the bills is proper, "I want the manager to decide what health care can and can not be based on its priority system? Seriously, we pay through flood insurance signed by the government to eat, to rebuild the multimillion-dollar homes – and five huts value of the figure – every time it rains a lot in an area prone to flooding. Why? There is no logic to the allocation of funds. It's all based on pork, and is not the big problem with the introduction of socialized medicine in a form of government republic – because New York has more AIDS patients, less money will go to Alabama for children with leukemia. It is a question of another person who creates a priority individuals. Which is directly against support. I hear what you say – my husband and I each run our own companies, and health insurance, with gratitude, through HSA. We pay a relatively low premium, with a large deductible, frankly access roads should catastrophic illness befall our family. We pay out of pocket for all visits and medicine dr. It is difficult, and because we are healthy, it is tempting not to write that check every month. Continually investigate ways to reduce our system health and other expenses. But that's the way it should be – and when I look at the picture I can not honestly support the government to make decisions that directly affect my life more – the IRS is the largest employer in the U.S., and seems to thrive off the terrorist tactics of collection and an inability to manage a budget – the public ed system produces criminal desertion graduates of Ivy League, and yet we pay more per student than many of the best private schools (which have better results exponentially). Obama keeps chanting "Yes We Can" – what it should say "Yes we" – who are ultimately responsible for our own welfare. And fortunately, we live in a perfect country to do so. PS I do not know what that has to do w / your first question, but I'll go with you on most Bush govt us has left … I do not understand, and I sure do not look forward to pay for it (ick). Wars are necessary – with sadness. The world is a better place without Saddam, and stability the Middle East is essential if we are to avoid a nuclear catastrophe and chemistry.
Google Health – Product Overview